↓ Skip to main content

Science

Hunting the eagle killer: A cyanobacterial neurotoxin causes vacuolar myelinopathy

Overview of attention for article published in Science, March 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
103 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
246 Mendeley
Title
Hunting the eagle killer: A cyanobacterial neurotoxin causes vacuolar myelinopathy
Published in
Science, March 2021
DOI 10.1126/science.aax9050
Pubmed ID
Authors

Steffen Breinlinger, Tabitha J Phillips, Brigette N Haram, Jan Mareš, José A Martínez Yerena, Pavel Hrouzek, Roman Sobotka, W Matthew Henderson, Peter Schmieder, Susan M Williams, James D Lauderdale, H Dayton Wilde, Wesley Gerrin, Andreja Kust, John W Washington, Christoph Wagner, Benedikt Geier, Manuel Liebeke, Heike Enke, Timo H J Niedermeyer, Susan B Wilde

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 752 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 246 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 246 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 42 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 14%
Student > Master 21 9%
Student > Bachelor 17 7%
Professor 13 5%
Other 42 17%
Unknown 76 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 40 16%
Environmental Science 32 13%
Chemistry 26 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 25 10%
Engineering 7 3%
Other 28 11%
Unknown 88 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1167. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 November 2023.
All research outputs
#12,652
of 25,750,437 outputs
Outputs from Science
#647
of 83,284 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#543
of 456,982 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#28
of 899 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,750,437 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 83,284 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 65.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 456,982 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 899 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.