↓ Skip to main content

Science

Article Metrics

Hunting the eagle killer: A cyanobacterial neurotoxin causes vacuolar myelinopathy

Overview of attention for article published in Science, March 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
Title
Hunting the eagle killer: A cyanobacterial neurotoxin causes vacuolar myelinopathy
Published in
Science, March 2021
DOI 10.1126/science.aax9050
Pubmed ID
Authors

Steffen Breinlinger, Tabitha J. Phillips, Brigette N. Haram, Jan Mareš, José A. Martínez Yerena, Pavel Hrouzek, Roman Sobotka, W. Matthew Henderson, Peter Schmieder, Susan M. Williams, James D. Lauderdale, H. Dayton Wilde, Wesley Gerrin, Andreja Kust, John W. Washington, Christoph Wagner, Benedikt Geier, Manuel Liebeke, Heike Enke, Timo H. J. Niedermeyer, Susan B. Wilde

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 711 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 42%
Unspecified 2 17%
Other 2 17%
Student > Bachelor 1 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 25%
Unspecified 3 25%
Chemistry 2 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 17%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 8%
Other 1 8%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1081. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2021.
All research outputs
#6,886
of 17,508,799 outputs
Outputs from Science
#460
of 70,936 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#314
of 238,136 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#24
of 750 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,508,799 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 70,936 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 238,136 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 750 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.