| Title |
Thickness and structure of the martian crust from InSight seismic data
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Science, July 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1126/science.abf8966 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Brigitte Knapmeyer-Endrun, Mark P Panning, Felix Bissig, Rakshit Joshi, Amir Khan, Doyeon Kim, Vedran Lekić, Benoit Tauzin, Saikiran Tharimena, Matthieu Plasman, Nicolas Compaire, Raphael F Garcia, Ludovic Margerin, Martin Schimmel, Éléonore Stutzmann, Nicholas Schmerr, Ebru Bozdağ, Ana-Catalina Plesa, Mark A Wieczorek, Adrien Broquet, Daniele Antonangeli, Scott M McLennan, Henri Samuel, Chloé Michaut, Lu Pan, Suzanne E Smrekar, Catherine L Johnson, Nienke Brinkman, Anna Mittelholz, Attilio Rivoldini, Paul M Davis, Philippe Lognonné, Baptiste Pinot, John-Robert Scholz, Simon Stähler, Martin Knapmeyer, Martin van Driel, Domenico Giardini, W Bruce Banerdt |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 139 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 16 | 12% |
| Thailand | 8 | 6% |
| Chile | 6 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 4% |
| Spain | 4 | 3% |
| France | 3 | 2% |
| Mexico | 2 | 1% |
| Belgium | 2 | 1% |
| Brazil | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 15 | 11% |
| Unknown | 75 | 54% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 117 | 84% |
| Scientists | 17 | 12% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 2% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 184 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 184 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 35 | 19% |
| Researcher | 32 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 7% |
| Professor | 7 | 4% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 23 | 13% |
| Unknown | 67 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 87 | 47% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 12 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 1% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 6 | 3% |
| Unknown | 72 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2198. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 February 2024.
All research outputs
#3,951
of 25,775,807 outputs
Outputs from Science
#211
of 83,324 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#224
of 446,284 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#10
of 788 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,775,807 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 83,324 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 66.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,284 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 788 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.