Title |
Intergenerational inequities in exposure to climate extremes
|
---|---|
Published in |
Science, September 2021
|
DOI | 10.1126/science.abi7339 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Wim Thiery, Stefan Lange, Joeri Rogelj, Carl-Friedrich Schleussner, Lukas Gudmundsson, Sonia I Seneviratne, Marina Andrijevic, Katja Frieler, Kerry Emanuel, Tobias Geiger, David N Bresch, Fang Zhao, Sven N Willner, Matthias Büchner, Jan Volkholz, Nico Bauer, Jinfeng Chang, Philippe Ciais, Marie Dury, Louis François, Manolis Grillakis, Simon N Gosling, Naota Hanasaki, Thomas Hickler, Veronika Huber, Akihiko Ito, Jonas Jägermeyr, Nikolay Khabarov, Aristeidis Koutroulis, Wenfeng Liu, Wolfgang Lutz, Matthias Mengel, Christoph Müller, Sebastian Ostberg, Christopher P O Reyer, Tobias Stacke, Yoshihide Wada |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,908 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
France | 190 | 10% |
United States | 175 | 9% |
Germany | 90 | 5% |
United Kingdom | 68 | 4% |
Belgium | 55 | 3% |
Canada | 40 | 2% |
Netherlands | 37 | 2% |
Australia | 33 | 2% |
Chile | 33 | 2% |
Other | 280 | 15% |
Unknown | 907 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1554 | 81% |
Scientists | 288 | 15% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 44 | 2% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 22 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 296 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 296 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 48 | 16% |
Researcher | 48 | 16% |
Student > Master | 20 | 7% |
Student > Bachelor | 14 | 5% |
Other | 13 | 4% |
Other | 51 | 17% |
Unknown | 102 | 34% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Environmental Science | 51 | 17% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 34 | 11% |
Social Sciences | 21 | 7% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 4% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 4% |
Other | 51 | 17% |
Unknown | 116 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3576. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,553
of 25,589,756 outputs
Outputs from Science
#92
of 83,122 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#101
of 436,784 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#6
of 567 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,589,756 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 83,122 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 65.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,784 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 567 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.