| Title |
Ivory poaching and the rapid evolution of tusklessness in African elephants
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Science, October 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1126/science.abe7389 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Shane C Campbell-Staton, Brian J Arnold, Dominique Gonçalves, Petter Granli, Joyce Poole, Ryan A Long, Robert M Pringle |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,562 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 227 | 15% |
| India | 133 | 9% |
| United Kingdom | 67 | 4% |
| Japan | 40 | 3% |
| Canada | 32 | 2% |
| France | 26 | 2% |
| Germany | 21 | 1% |
| Mexico | 19 | 1% |
| Spain | 18 | 1% |
| Other | 226 | 14% |
| Unknown | 753 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1128 | 72% |
| Scientists | 388 | 25% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 32 | 2% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 13 | <1% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 311 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 311 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 42 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 41 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 33 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 28 | 9% |
| Other | 17 | 5% |
| Other | 45 | 14% |
| Unknown | 105 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 91 | 29% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 35 | 11% |
| Environmental Science | 20 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 2% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 32 | 10% |
| Unknown | 121 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3377. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,780
of 25,782,229 outputs
Outputs from Science
#103
of 83,331 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107
of 444,167 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#7
of 512 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,782,229 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 83,331 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 66.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 444,167 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 512 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.