↓ Skip to main content

Science

Article Metrics

Forgotten books: The application of unseen species models to the survival of culture

Overview of attention for article published in Science, February 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
118 news outlets
book_reviews
1 book reviewer
blogs
9 blogs
twitter
256 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
reddit
2 Redditors

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
Title
Forgotten books: The application of unseen species models to the survival of culture
Published in
Science, February 2022
DOI 10.1126/science.abl7655
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mike Kestemont, Folgert Karsdorp, Elisabeth de Bruijn, Matthew Driscoll, Katarzyna A. Kapitan, Pádraig Ó Macháin, Daniel Sawyer, Remco Sleiderink, Anne Chao

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 256 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 36 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 11%
Student > Bachelor 4 11%
Other 2 6%
Other 6 17%
Unknown 10 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 4 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 8%
Psychology 3 8%
Arts and Humanities 3 8%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 8%
Other 8 22%
Unknown 12 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1171. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2022.
All research outputs
#8,684
of 21,419,814 outputs
Outputs from Science
#510
of 76,406 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#412
of 334,395 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#20
of 468 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,419,814 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 76,406 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 60.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 334,395 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 468 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.