| Title |
Forgotten books: The application of unseen species models to the survival of culture
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Science, February 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1126/science.abl7655 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mike Kestemont, Folgert Karsdorp, Elisabeth de Bruijn, Matthew Driscoll, Katarzyna A Kapitan, Pádraig Ó Macháin, Daniel Sawyer, Remco Sleiderink, Anne Chao |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 242 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 30 | 12% |
| United Kingdom | 22 | 9% |
| Ireland | 8 | 3% |
| Argentina | 7 | 3% |
| France | 7 | 3% |
| Belgium | 6 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 6 | 2% |
| Canada | 5 | 2% |
| Spain | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 35 | 14% |
| Unknown | 112 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 168 | 69% |
| Scientists | 55 | 23% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 15 | 6% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 58 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 14% |
| Other | 7 | 12% |
| Researcher | 7 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 9 | 16% |
| Unknown | 18 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 12% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 4 | 7% |
| Environmental Science | 4 | 7% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 4 | 7% |
| Arts and Humanities | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 15 | 26% |
| Unknown | 20 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1170. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 February 2024.
All research outputs
#12,562
of 25,711,194 outputs
Outputs from Science
#645
of 83,253 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#540
of 450,511 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#19
of 470 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,711,194 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 83,253 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 65.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,511 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 470 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.