| Title |
Single-step hydrogen production from NH3, CH4, and biogas in stacked proton ceramic reactors
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Science, April 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1126/science.abj3951 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Daniel Clark, Harald Malerød-Fjeld, Michael Budd, Irene Yuste-Tirados, Dustin Beeaff, Simen Aamodt, Kevin Nguyen, Luca Ansaloni, Thijs Peters, Per K Vestre, Dimitrios K Pappas, María I Valls, Sonia Remiro-Buenamañana, Truls Norby, Tor S Bjørheim, Jose M Serra, Christian Kjølseth |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 37 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 14% |
| Norway | 3 | 8% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Belgium | 1 | 3% |
| India | 1 | 3% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| South Africa | 1 | 3% |
| Indonesia | 1 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 22 | 59% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 31 | 84% |
| Scientists | 5 | 14% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 109 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 18 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 6% |
| Professor | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 13 | 12% |
| Unknown | 43 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemical Engineering | 18 | 17% |
| Materials Science | 17 | 16% |
| Engineering | 9 | 8% |
| Chemistry | 6 | 6% |
| Energy | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 4% |
| Unknown | 51 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 305. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 July 2023.
All research outputs
#112,898
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Science
#3,662
of 82,918 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,592
of 445,119 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#95
of 483 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 82,918 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 65.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 445,119 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 483 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.