Review by F. Pacheco-Torgal
This paper based sting operation may have been successful to show that a lot of open access journals are just part of the taking business. However, it’s a pitty that the author did not performed a…
This paper based sting operation may have been successful to show that a lot of open access journals are just part of the taking business. However, it’s a pitty that the author did not performed a…
What's wrong, Peer 3, afraid of being identified as the harassing "Peer X" on the other threads indicated above? Too late for your diversionary tactics.
actually, the creator of the second thread *should* have known better. On a second look we better stick to this one.
Who knows. Another mess-up at PubPeer, decreasing trust in this platform, which is filled with trolls. But at least it gives two opportunities to keep raising awareness about Bohannon's lack of…
??? Why two independent discussion threads about the same paper??
Good to see that the trolls have redirected their idiotic claims rather than addressing Bohannon's free pass to unethical publishing practices:https://www...
Please follow the circus that is evolving regarding the criticism around this paper:https://www.pubpeer.com/publications/E902004AA49A4636D480087B2A6BE8 https://www...
I am afraid that in case Peer 6 was the author he is unlikely to come back. As mentioned above, I believe this whole discussion is totally misplaced...
Peer 2: Learn to read, you nincompoop. Peer 5 is suggesting that Peer 6 may be Bohannon (i.e., "the author"), not you.Until you learn how to read and comprehend before replying (and then take a deep…
Peer 5, back at his trademark trolling, false insinuations (i.e., libel) and harassment. I can confirm that I am not Peer 6. When is Peer 0 going to step in and moderate this nonsense? Peer 0…
This is interesting -- is peer 6 the author? If so, thanks for commenting here, but I understand why you would not like to participate further, based on the opening comment.
Dear Peer 2, whoever you are, I am sorry if you get offended by my concerns of whether users of this platform always use their own nominal accounts...
I can confirm that I'm not Peer 6. But that's all I can say with any certainty.
1. I have not participated in this conversation previously, so I am not "one of the above."2. Some conversations are tedious in their tendentiousness, and not worth participating in...
Rather than dealing with masks here, let's take the discussion to a named platform where we can see your true identities, Peers 3, 4 and 5:http://www...
Peer 4, I identified myself in my thread in November.So, peer 4, do you approve of Bohannon's publishing ethics?
Peer 5 is not suggesting that you may have used Aceil Al-Khatib's ID in particular, so it is not clear what contacting this individual would accomplish...
This is a blatant and a libelous accusation that is not moderated by PubPeer. In fact, one could say that PubPeer is supporting this libelous campaign...
Also, as mentioned above, there is reason to suspect others included he can be using other authors' IDs. If so is true, there is no telling as to how many Peers and unregs in any discussion could in…
If a discussion on the reference above (which is not good, in my opinion) is what this thread is pushing, why not opening a discussion directly on it?Moreover, if the author of the reference above…
Could I suggest to JATdS, if that means Teixeira da Silva, J.A., to allocate a bit more of time and care into reviewing critically his own publications instead of flooding PPPR with unobjective…
I count at least 21 questions in the OP's opener. That's impressive. If Bohannon has a couple of weeks free he might like to start to address them...
Jaime, why do you comment both as an unregistered submission and as a peer on the same thread? Is this a tactic that you often employ on on other threads as well?
Teixeira da Silva, J.A., Al-Khatib, A. (2016) Questioning the ethics of John Bohannon’s hoaxes and stings in the context of science publishing...
I (JATdS) am astonished to see zero comments at PubPeer about this paper.Some questions to Bohannon and the AAAS. A slightly different version of the questions was sent to Bohannon in late 2013, but…
George McNamara | Nov 15 2013 20:15 ESTPlease read Michael Eisen's column athttp://www.michaeleisen.org/blog/?p=1439thanks...