| Title |
A biodiversity target based on species extinctions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Science, June 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1126/science.aba6592 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mark D. A. Rounsevell, Mike Harfoot, Paula A. Harrison, Tim Newbold, Richard D. Gregory, Georgina M. Mace |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 323 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 80 | 25% |
| United States | 31 | 10% |
| Germany | 15 | 5% |
| Canada | 10 | 3% |
| Spain | 7 | 2% |
| India | 6 | 2% |
| Italy | 5 | 2% |
| Australia | 5 | 2% |
| Belgium | 4 | 1% |
| Other | 46 | 14% |
| Unknown | 114 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 212 | 66% |
| Scientists | 99 | 31% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 2% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 306 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 306 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 62 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 50 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 33 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 22 | 7% |
| Other | 18 | 6% |
| Other | 48 | 16% |
| Unknown | 73 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 91 | 30% |
| Environmental Science | 65 | 21% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 10 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 3% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 28 | 9% |
| Unknown | 97 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 388. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 September 2023.
All research outputs
#76,390
of 24,874,764 outputs
Outputs from Science
#2,675
of 80,286 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,764
of 404,511 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#112
of 964 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,874,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 80,286 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 64.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 404,511 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 964 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.