The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 373 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Environmentally relevant concentrations of microplastic particles influence larval fish ecology
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Science, June 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1126/science.aad8828 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Oona M Lönnstedt, Peter Eklöv |
| Abstract |
The widespread occurrence and accumulation of plastic waste in the environment have become a growing global concern over the past decade. Although some marine organisms have been shown to ingest plastic, few studies have investigated the ecological effects of plastic waste on animals. Here we show that exposure to environmentally relevant concentrations of microplastic polystyrene particles (90 micrometers) inhibits hatching, decreases growth rates, and alters feeding preferences and innate behaviors of European perch (Perca fluviatilis) larvae. Furthermore, individuals exposed to microplastics do not respond to olfactory threat cues, which greatly increases predator-induced mortality rates. Our results demonstrate that microplastic particles operate both chemically and physically on larval fish performance and development. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 45 | 12% |
| United Kingdom | 29 | 8% |
| Australia | 15 | 4% |
| Sweden | 12 | 3% |
| Canada | 12 | 3% |
| Spain | 7 | 2% |
| France | 6 | 2% |
| South Africa | 4 | 1% |
| Belgium | 4 | 1% |
| Other | 36 | 10% |
| Unknown | 203 | 54% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 243 | 65% |
| Scientists | 116 | 31% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 12 | 3% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 772 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Japan | 2 | <1% |
| Sweden | 2 | <1% |
| Denmark | 2 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 5 | <1% |
| Unknown | 748 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 125 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 118 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 115 | 15% |
| Researcher | 112 | 15% |
| Other | 33 | 4% |
| Other | 126 | 16% |
| Unknown | 143 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 213 | 28% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 191 | 25% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 36 | 5% |
| Chemistry | 31 | 4% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 28 | 4% |
| Other | 83 | 11% |
| Unknown | 190 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1134. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2024.
All research outputs
#14,037
of 26,556,730 outputs
Outputs from Science
#694
of 84,174 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#187
of 357,377 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#8
of 1,151 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,556,730 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 84,174 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 66.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,377 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,151 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.