↓ Skip to main content

Science

Epidemiology and transmission dynamics of COVID-19 in two Indian states

Overview of attention for article published in Science, September 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#39 of 83,337)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
420 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
546 Mendeley
Title
Epidemiology and transmission dynamics of COVID-19 in two Indian states
Published in
Science, September 2020
DOI 10.1126/science.abd7672
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ramanan Laxminarayan, Brian Wahl, Shankar Reddy Dudala, K. Gopal, Chandra Mohan B, S. Neelima, K. S. Jawahar Reddy, J. Radhakrishnan, Joseph A. Lewnard

Abstract

Although most cases of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) have occurred in low-resource countries, little is known about the epidemiology of the disease in such contexts. Data from the Indian states of Tamil Nadu and Andhra Pradesh provide a detailed view into severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) transmission pathways and mortality in a high-incidence setting. Reported cases and deaths have been concentrated in younger cohorts than would be expected from observations in higher-income countries, even after accounting for demographic differences across settings. Among 575,071 individuals exposed to 84,965 confirmed cases, infection probabilities ranged from 4.7 to 10.7% for low-risk and high-risk contact types, respectively. Same-age contacts were associated with the greatest infection risk. Case fatality ratios spanned 0.05% at ages of 5 to 17 years to 16.6% at ages of 85 years or more. Primary data from low-resource countries are urgently needed to guide control measures.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5,110 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 546 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 546 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 85 16%
Student > Master 52 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 49 9%
Student > Bachelor 43 8%
Other 27 5%
Other 102 19%
Unknown 188 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 100 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 35 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 30 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 28 5%
Social Sciences 21 4%
Other 110 20%
Unknown 222 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5405. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 December 2023.
All research outputs
#702
of 25,789,020 outputs
Outputs from Science
#39
of 83,337 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46
of 433,956 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#2
of 978 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,789,020 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 83,337 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 66.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,956 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 978 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.