The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 240 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Mouse embryonic stem cells self-organize into trunk-like structures with neural tube and somites
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Science, December 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1126/science.aba4937 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jesse V Veenvliet, Adriano Bolondi, Helene Kretzmer, Leah Haut, Manuela Scholze-Wittler, Dennis Schifferl, Frederic Koch, Léo Guignard, Abhishek Sampath Kumar, Milena Pustet, Simon Heimann, René Buschow, Lars Wittler, Bernd Timmermann, Alexander Meissner, Bernhard G Herrmann |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 39 | 16% |
| Germany | 34 | 14% |
| Spain | 12 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 11 | 5% |
| France | 9 | 4% |
| Switzerland | 9 | 4% |
| Netherlands | 8 | 3% |
| Italy | 4 | 2% |
| Japan | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 23 | 10% |
| Unknown | 87 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 126 | 53% |
| Members of the public | 105 | 44% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 6 | 3% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 367 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 367 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 68 | 19% |
| Researcher | 51 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 41 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 38 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 3% |
| Other | 46 | 13% |
| Unknown | 111 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 133 | 36% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 50 | 14% |
| Neuroscience | 15 | 4% |
| Engineering | 9 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 7 | 2% |
| Other | 33 | 9% |
| Unknown | 120 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 280. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 June 2024.
All research outputs
#136,446
of 26,239,624 outputs
Outputs from Science
#4,198
of 82,665 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,844
of 535,181 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#100
of 894 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,239,624 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 82,665 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 67.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 535,181 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 894 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.