↓ Skip to main content

Science

Salicylic acid modulates colonization of the root microbiome by specific bacterial taxa

Overview of attention for article published in Science, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
twitter
148 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
6 Facebook pages
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
888 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
882 Mendeley
Title
Salicylic acid modulates colonization of the root microbiome by specific bacterial taxa
Published in
Science, July 2015
DOI 10.1126/science.aaa8764
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sarah L Lebeis, Sur Herrera Paredes, Derek S Lundberg, Natalie Breakfield, Jase Gehring, Meredith McDonald, Stephanie Malfatti, Tijana Glavina del Rio, Corbin D Jones, Susannah G Tringe, Jeffery L Dangl

Abstract

Immune systems distinguish "self" from "non-self" to maintain homeostasis and must differentially gate access to allow colonization by potentially beneficial, non-pathogenic microbes. Plant roots grow within extremely diverse soil microbial communities, but assemble a taxonomically limited root-associated microbiome. We grew isogenic Arabidopsis thaliana mutants with altered immune systems in a wild soil and also in recolonization experiments with a synthetic bacterial community. We established that biosynthesis of, and signaling dependent on, the foliar defense phytohormone salicylic acid is required to assemble a normal root microbiome. Salicylic acid modulates colonization of the root by specific bacterial families. Thus, plant immune signaling drives selection from the available microbial communities to sculpt the root microbiome.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 148 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 882 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 11 1%
France 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Unknown 862 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 210 24%
Researcher 160 18%
Student > Master 95 11%
Student > Bachelor 64 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 51 6%
Other 126 14%
Unknown 176 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 416 47%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 121 14%
Environmental Science 44 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 25 3%
Engineering 14 2%
Other 52 6%
Unknown 210 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 168. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 October 2023.
All research outputs
#246,125
of 25,791,949 outputs
Outputs from Science
#6,860
of 83,344 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,462
of 277,091 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#120
of 1,377 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,791,949 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 83,344 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 66.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,091 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,377 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.