@stevemur There are plenty of people in academia/science who are calling for more oversight into GoF research, they just aren't doing it with a big D on their chest. https://t.co/T5S9W8QvOz https://t.co/dPkBaP7xZS https://t.co/eFcIIXOiLp https://t.co/FDDw
RT @Dissenting2020: @flodebarre @MichaelWorobey @angie_rasmussen 2\ Guilty or innocent, when you're a suspect, keeping your mouth shut is n…
Hedging without being too explicit is not very courageous.
@angoffinet He was a coauthor of Bloom et al 2021 https://t.co/fxv8UpeyrE
RT @Dissenting2020: @flodebarre @MichaelWorobey @angie_rasmussen 2\ Guilty or innocent, when you're a suspect, keeping your mouth shut is n…
@flodebarre @MichaelWorobey @angie_rasmussen 2\ Guilty or innocent, when you're a suspect, keeping your mouth shut is normally for the best, and what a defense attorney will tell their client, guilty or innocent, right @ProGof39474 ? However, Baric did sig
In 2021, Worobey also signed a letter demanding a better investigation into covid origins: https://t.co/Qe79sCU0sD
@jeffb724 @CollignonPeter Not the only ones to call for a proper investigation by any stretch. Add the Lancet COVID-19 Commission and WHO in more recent times calling for data on both the animal trade and Wuhan labs to be shared. https://t.co/l49sfEReyr
@ChristiaanPtr @_everythingism @FairyCalvo Here are 18 experts calling for an investigation of a possible lab origin. Of them, only Worobey has changed his position. https://t.co/hMrnCpWl1H
@Corp_Raider99 @past_is_future I guess it's possible...but I find hard to believe this information would be sitting in emails somewhere and it never get leaked or released. Also why did Baric himself call for an investigation of the lab if he's responsibl
@DrHermiz @loofymectin 3\ "investigate the origins" commentary https://t.co/sWDyv7kzZg Worobey did to (a mole? or just flipped?) He also published the papers on synthesis of novel pango-CoVs, at BSL3, and warned against the temptation to add an FCS in the
RT @gumby4christ: I say "interestingly" because one of the (IMO) disturbing features of Chan's Covid-origin research has been her willingne…
@Chris__Sage @Engineer2The @kellywind @levine2001 @MJnanostretch Everyone wants more transparency from WHO &CCP letter to Science(journal) by scientists asks for more transparency & investigation into both zoonotic/lab origin Worobey & Baric
@antti_nannimus @NateSilver538 Lab leak has been one example. Although most fact checker sites changed tack around mid 2021 after various scientists called for lab origin to be properly investigated (still hasn't been possible). https://t.co/l49sfEReyr
@BMauschen Zu beachten auch dieses Statements namhafter Experten https://t.co/xI5cwkiixr https://t.co/eR35tZ8P0v
@ArthurCDent You just got lucky. Some experts were deeply wrong (see the link). I did my own research 😛🙃 https://t.co/m5eFpw7ZxI
@VBruttel @Noldoggs11 @garyruskin Remember that in 2021 Baric signed this letter... https://t.co/eQsDjOt0jA https://t.co/P7HmUhX9sr
RT @Rossana38510044: So true. After that @TheLancet https://t.co/ys9m6q7GD6 and @ScienceMagazine https://t.co/WC56pLWMkN recognized that…
@PovedaJB Es una carta, una peticion de mejor investigacion, en particular de la tesis del escape de un laboratorio. https://t.co/e8FwO18NYS https://t.co/iPSFVmT0qa
RT @TalmasAmorim: Investigate the origins of COVID-19 https://t.co/QGQMAi6f5f
@acebojangles They are gaslighting plain and simple. Anyone saying "conspiracy theories" is doing it as well. Baric himself signed a letter with Alina Chan, who was massively attacked and still is, to investigate the WIV. https://t.co/9E1mZo99f8
RT @Biorealism: @AlanNeff @magi_jay David Relman, Jesse Bloom, Ravi Gupta, Virginie Courtier-Orgogozo, Etienne Decroly, @MonaRahalkar, Marc…
@AlanNeff @magi_jay David Relman, Jesse Bloom, Ravi Gupta, Virginie Courtier-Orgogozo, Etienne Decroly, @MonaRahalkar, Marc Lipsitch, Stuart Newman, Pamela Bjorkman, Sarah Cobey, Rossana Segreto. All consider lab origin v plausible. https://t.co/e7YhCE078
RT @Rossana38510044: So true. After that @TheLancet https://t.co/ys9m6q7GD6 and @ScienceMagazine https://t.co/WC56pLWMkN recognized that…
RT @Biorealism: @BConn39 @humblesci @SharriMarkson That said, there are various experts who consider lab origin very plausible or even like…
@BConn39 @humblesci @SharriMarkson That said, there are various experts who consider lab origin very plausible or even likely (eg. Dept of Energy Z-Division scientists at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory). Jesse Bloom, David Fisman, Francois Balloux
@TedMoondust Also May, 2021: https://t.co/YnHjWHqJ9g
RT @Biorealism: @Cole_August @RVAwonk The likes of David Relman, David Fisman, Jesse Bloom, Ravi Gupta, Marc Lipsitch, Carl Bergstrom, Rich…
@Cole_August @RVAwonk The likes of David Relman, David Fisman, Jesse Bloom, Ravi Gupta, Marc Lipsitch, Carl Bergstrom, Richard Ebright, Virginie Courtier, Nikolai Petrovsky, Raina MacIntyre, Bernard Roizman are hardly seeking to destroy expertise. https://
RT @Rossana38510044: So true. After that @TheLancet https://t.co/ys9m6q7GD6 and @ScienceMagazine https://t.co/WC56pLWMkN recognized that…
RT @Rossana38510044: So true. After that @TheLancet https://t.co/ys9m6q7GD6 and @ScienceMagazine https://t.co/WC56pLWMkN recognized that…
@DarrenWalshDCU @PhilippMarkolin There are clearly many who do not agree. David Relman, Jesse Bloom, David Fisman, Ravi Gupta, Etienne Decroly, Virginie Courtier-Orgogozo, Raina MacIntyre, David Baltimore, Stuart Newman, Francois Balloux to name a few. htt
@EricSaund @MichaelJLeone @mbw61567742 @JamesFallows @propublica Off hand, David Relman, David Baltimore, David Fisman, Jesse Bloom, Francois Balloux, Justin Kinney, Bernard Roizman, Raina MacIntyre, Marc Lipsitch, Peter Collignon, Ravi Gupta, Etienne Decr
RT @Biorealism: @mehdirhasan Similarly the signatories of the letters to Lancet and Science noting lab origin is very plausible and calling…
@mehdirhasan Similarly the signatories of the letters to Lancet and Science noting lab origin is very plausible and calling for a proper investigation. https://t.co/e7YhCE078V https://t.co/l49sfEReyr
@mattwridley Why were ALINA CHAN & American gain-of-function expert in same group deflecting attention to WIV? https://t.co/w27srr3qVx DEFUSE grant proposal specified Baric to do the genetic engineering of furin cleavage site at his North Carolina lab
@Studio28nyc @KatherineEban Why were Alina Chan & American gain-of-function expert Ralph Baric in the same group deflecting attention to WIV? https://t.co/vhzQgx1Taa According to the DARPA grant proposal, Baric was supposed to do the genetic engineeri
Il rapporto richiedeva verifiche. Una virologa cinese a Wuhan affermò che gli scienziati dei laboratori erano negativi al COVID. In seguito, un gruppo di scienziati ha critica su Science l'indagine dell'OMS, secondo loro troppo sbilanciata sullo spillover:
@IANADracula @TheModHostess @lisa_iannattone How is it any less xenophobic to say Covid came from a Chinese food market? Also note the nuance between saying something is a valid theory [that should be thoroughly investigated] and arguing for it. https://t.
@CheeseyTakes Fisman endorsing a fishy story frm fishy source. https://t.co/tmKN2IWzvR Fisman's group included gain-of-function researcher Ralph Baric https://t.co/vhzQgx1Taa Fisman re-tweets anti-China propaganda frm Australian Strategic Policy Institut
@mkeulemans @djdejeu In 2021 riepen zo'n 15 wetenschappers op tot onderzoek en daarbij het serieus nemen van zowel lableak als natuurlijke origine als hypothesen. Bekende namen zoals Jesse Bloom, Michael Worobey, Ralph Baric. Maar Angela Rasmussen was er
@leopolcote @Guglielminetti Non. Même dans la revue Science on exigeait une enquête en soulignant l’hypothèse https://t.co/CjgvTt16OP
RT @Biorealism: @shallit43 @stephen_lagana @Rebecca21951651 @dorkmo @gdemaneuf @Bridgetdonegal1 @ianbirrell @BBCr4today There is no consens…
RT @Biorealism: @shallit43 @stephen_lagana @Rebecca21951651 @dorkmo @gdemaneuf @Bridgetdonegal1 @ianbirrell @BBCr4today There is no consens…
@shallit43 @stephen_lagana @Rebecca21951651 @dorkmo @gdemaneuf @Bridgetdonegal1 @ianbirrell @BBCr4today There is no consensus. WHO, Lancet Covid19 Commission, have said all hypotheses remain on the table. Dept of Energy, FBI favor lab origin. Various exper
Perhaps I should see where @MichaelWorobey appears in the book. Let me consult the index. Here he is, just once, on page 268. Why, but that’s only his co-signing the letter to Science asking for investigations into lab origins. https://t.co/wxLnjpQEAW (5
@crwequine Baric’s own thoughts, which I agree with: https://t.co/Rfhi2S97gy https://t.co/k5vOtWXlbx
RT @Biorealism: @tp_weber @continuousflux David Relman, Jesse Bloom, David Fisman, Etienne Decroly, Bernard Roizman, Ralph Baric, Raina Mac…
@tp_weber @continuousflux David Relman, Jesse Bloom, David Fisman, Etienne Decroly, Bernard Roizman, Ralph Baric, Raina MacIntyre, Marc Lipsitch, Stuart Newman, amongst other signatories of these letters to Science and the Lancet are hardly unqualified. h
@Biorealism @OdysseyBohemian @dilanesper https://t.co/yzHzp2jUI9 You do realize that at least one coauthor of Bloom’s letter supporting an open investigation has favored the zoonotic origin and the other, Ralph Baric, is one of the proposed collaborators
@MadAdamison @Desgg94 @lableakdude @bluragger @quickzcopingHD @JoeBiden Chinese researchers Botao and Lei Xiao suggested lab origin was likely on 6 Feb 2020. Before the gag order took effect. The Lancet Covid19 Commission & various experts have called
@jgharris7 @dilanesper Agree, it's just an example of the potential disincentives to considering a potential lab origin. Since 2021, a number of experts have openly called for a proper investigation in Lancet https://t.co/e7YhCE078V and Science. https://
RT @Biorealism: @sensiN23 @Eyeoftg @davidpgoldman It's not just, WHO, Lancet Covid19 Commission, or agencies you mentioned. David Relman, J…
@sensiN23 @Eyeoftg @davidpgoldman It's not just, WHO, Lancet Covid19 Commission, or agencies you mentioned. David Relman, Jesse Bloom, David Fisman, Ravi Gupta, Raina MacIntyre, Marc Lipsitch, Ralph Baric & various others have called for proper investi
@mbalter @walizonia @mattklewis Yes, Bloom for example. Not to mention experts like Relman, Marc Lipsitch, Trevor Bedford, Stuart Newman, Justin Kinney, David Fisman, Etienne Decroly, Adrian Gibbs, Nikolai Petrovsky, Raina MacIntyre, Colin Butler etc. http
RT @JackDempsey2_2: @HansMahncke This was the article----- requesting first *proper, unbiased* investigation into SARS2 origins. https://t.…
@harishseshadri2 Interesting. I didn't realize that Baric himself was pushing for more investigation of the lab leak hypothesis. Limited hangout? Controlled opposition? UNC politics/optics? https://t.co/A5Vb6KIU43
@HansMahncke This was the article----- requesting first *proper, unbiased* investigation into SARS2 origins. https://t.co/7fWq10dS0J
Investigate the origins of COVID-19 https://t.co/zpl6qCEUcC
RT @gumby4christ: I say "interestingly" because one of the (IMO) disturbing features of Chan's Covid-origin research has been her willingne…
@sai_suryan @StraightStats @BillyBostickson @garyruskin @USRightToKnow @uacjess @SciDiplomacyUSA @CDCgov @CDCemergency @CDCFlu @StateDept But then moved towards: <<investigate the labs>> Someone who knew the early errors & compromised prime
@rachelschraer Investigate the origins of COVID-19 -18 biologists, including leading and outspoken experts on this pandemic like the Harvard epidemiologist Marc Lipsitch and Yale immunologist Akiko Iwasaki, published https://t.co/hfRdamS4kB
@CyHusain @pbleic @BallouxFrancois @angie_rasmussen If you literally don't even know who Jesse Bloom is, then you have zero business ever trying to tell scientists what to think about the origin of covid. https://t.co/fxv8UpeyrE
9a/ This Tweet, I should add, came shortly AFTER a group of respected scientists published a letter in Science calling for a serious scientific investigation of the origins question. https://t.co/RYsz5ys0ZU
@DragonHarbinger @JeffNeelzebubII @LibertyCappy @bigcitybigfoot @RepMTG David Relman, an expert on microbiology and biosecurity from Stanford, seems to agree it's worth more investigation, and that lab leak can't be so easily hand waved away. Perhaps he's
@dvergano @KatherineJWu Sound advice. If you are looking for input from experts who have been agnostic in the face of the paucity of data either way the signatories of the following letters to the Lancet and Science Magazine may be of assistance. https://
@Megankstack @DrTedros (Bloom et al's letter to Science cited this disclaimer, agreeing with it: https://t.co/fxv8UpeyrE)
@MarcJaffe5 @michaelzlin @R_H_Ebright @Kingkiko61 In fairness, Baric has been relatively silent recently and was a signatory on this letter calling for a proper investigation. https://t.co/l49sfEReyr
RT @Biorealism: @nparoundight @joshtpm @NoahShachtman The DEFUSE proposal ultimately tipped Nick Patterson, one of the signatories of the S…
@nparoundight @joshtpm @NoahShachtman The DEFUSE proposal ultimately tipped Nick Patterson, one of the signatories of the Science letter calling for a proper investigation, to consider lab origin was likely. Ultimately we are unlikely to get a definitive a
@AtConsent @emilyakopp Worobey was one of the scientists who wrote a letter to Science after the proximal origins published demanding more research into the origin be done Podcasts used to host him as a “lab leak proponent” https://t.co/O6K1q7bdBd
@rdcopple @gregggonsalves @PeterHotez @thenation If I'm a conspiracy theorist then so are WHO, the Lancet Covid19 Commission, Taiwanese CECC, Dept of Energy Z Division, plus various experts who have called for a proper investigation in Lancet and Science.
@RottenInDenmark Talk to more experts - there is not yet a consensus because there is so little available data! https://t.co/Z6JqN6OTb3 Even the WHO has not ruled out a lab leak, though their investigations have stalled https://t.co/ErXB9sFwRj
@D28EquityNow @FrankMikeDavis1 @gregggonsalves @germanrlopez @nytimes It's sad to see it become politicized when various experts have been calling for a proper investigation in the Lancet and Science Magazine. https://t.co/e7YhCE078V https://t.co/l49sfER
RT @pvmarkov: This is why his perspective on the origin of the pandemic is so valuable and compelling. In fact nearly two years ago, he and…
RT @BUNKUROI: コロナ起源研究の核心の流れはこのウォロビー記事で説明されています。 彼は『サイエンス』のいくつもの査読論文や書簡に名を連ねている専門家です。 以下は参考まで https://t.co/Hdqn412swZ https://t.co/WzYBdamI…
RT @BUNKUROI: コロナ起源研究の核心の流れはこのウォロビー記事で説明されています。 彼は『サイエンス』のいくつもの査読論文や書簡に名を連ねている専門家です。 以下は参考まで https://t.co/Hdqn412swZ https://t.co/WzYBdamI…
RT @BUNKUROI: コロナ起源研究の核心の流れはこのウォロビー記事で説明されています。 彼は『サイエンス』のいくつもの査読論文や書簡に名を連ねている専門家です。 以下は参考まで https://t.co/Hdqn412swZ https://t.co/WzYBdamI…
RT @BUNKUROI: コロナ起源研究の核心の流れはこのウォロビー記事で説明されています。 彼は『サイエンス』のいくつもの査読論文や書簡に名を連ねている専門家です。 以下は参考まで https://t.co/Hdqn412swZ https://t.co/WzYBdamI…
RT @BUNKUROI: コロナ起源研究の核心の流れはこのウォロビー記事で説明されています。 彼は『サイエンス』のいくつもの査読論文や書簡に名を連ねている専門家です。 以下は参考まで https://t.co/Hdqn412swZ https://t.co/WzYBdamI…
コロナ起源研究の核心の流れはこのウォロビー記事で説明されています。 彼は『サイエンス』のいくつもの査読論文や書簡に名を連ねている専門家です。 以下は参考まで https://t.co/Hdqn412swZ https://t.co/WzYBdamIlv https://t.co/SIsydIpvr6 https://t.co/Bk8G4prDXQ https://t.co/SeJqqVuUU5
RT @flodebarre: Michael Worobey's perspective is original: he started with a very open mind (he signed the 2021 Science letter), worked har…
This is why his perspective on the origin of the pandemic is so valuable and compelling. In fact nearly two years ago, he and other colleagues called for a serious and impartial investigation of the lab leak hypotheses. https://t.co/eOGTp9KcCr
Michael Worobey's perspective is original: he started with a very open mind (he signed the 2021 Science letter), worked hard on the available data, trying to dismiss the market origin hypothesis... But the data were clear.▫️2/3 https://t.co/oJbcpTPV3z ht
@gregggonsalves @MichaelWorobey He also credited the same fallacious pro-market arguments both before [https://t.co/kArhOQphnn] and after [https://t.co/x4L2jltYqU] signing the Science letter calling for an inquiry, organized by @jbloom_lab, @Ayjchan et al.
@AdoredTV @nerdtechgasm The Lancet Covid19 Commission and WHO consider lab origin is very plausible and requires investigation. Various experts have outlined why it needs investigation in The Lancet & Science Magazine. https://t.co/e7YhCE078V https:/
@sirhlyon @SteveBigpond @stuartjdneil @breakfast_dogs @WashburneAlex @Florin_Uncovers @R_H_Ebright Nonetheless, various experts including David Relman, David Fisman, Jesse Bloom, Ravi Gupta, Raina MacIntyre, Bernard Roizman, Virginie Courtier-Orgogozo have
@gregggonsalves Various media falsely claimed there was a consensus despite the Lancet Covid19 Commission and WHO saying it was very plausible and needs to be investigated as have the likes of David Relman, David Fisman Jesse Bloom, Ravi Gupta. https://t.c
RT @Biorealism: @SaskiaPopescu Journalists should also consider who has called for proper investigation. Experts like David Relman, Jesse B…
@SaskiaPopescu Journalists should also consider who has called for proper investigation. Experts like David Relman, Jesse Bloom, Raina MacIntyre, Virginie Courtier-Orgogozo, Etienne Decroly and Nikolai Petrovsky and other signatories here. https://t.co/e7Y