↓ Skip to main content

Science

Article Metrics

Plastic ingestion as an evolutionary trap: Toward a holistic understanding

Overview of attention for article published in Science, July 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
twitter
621 tweeters
facebook
4 Facebook pages
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages
Title
Plastic ingestion as an evolutionary trap: Toward a holistic understanding
Published in
Science, July 2021
DOI 10.1126/science.abh0945
Pubmed ID
Authors

Robson G. Santos, Gabriel E. Machovsky-Capuska, Ryan Andrades

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 621 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 263. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 August 2021.
All research outputs
#79,092
of 18,475,574 outputs
Outputs from Science
#3,167
of 72,479 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,070
of 281,287 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#98
of 728 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,475,574 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 72,479 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 56.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 281,287 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 728 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.