↓ Skip to main content

Science

Article Metrics

Plastic ingestion as an evolutionary trap: Toward a holistic understanding

Overview of attention for article published in Science, July 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
20 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
1005 tweeters
facebook
4 Facebook pages
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
60 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
184 Mendeley
Title
Plastic ingestion as an evolutionary trap: Toward a holistic understanding
Published in
Science, July 2021
DOI 10.1126/science.abh0945
Pubmed ID
Authors

Robson G. Santos, Gabriel E. Machovsky-Capuska, Ryan Andrades

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,005 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 184 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 184 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 15%
Researcher 26 14%
Student > Master 20 11%
Student > Bachelor 16 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 8%
Other 32 17%
Unknown 49 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 41 22%
Environmental Science 31 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 6%
Chemistry 6 3%
Engineering 6 3%
Other 27 15%
Unknown 62 34%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 676. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 September 2022.
All research outputs
#23,863
of 22,101,977 outputs
Outputs from Science
#1,164
of 77,238 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#943
of 344,700 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#41
of 838 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,101,977 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 77,238 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 61.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,700 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 838 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.