Title |
Integrate biodiversity targets from local to global levels
|
---|---|
Published in |
Science, August 2021
|
DOI | 10.1126/science.abh2234 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
David O Obura, Yemi Katerere, Mariam Mayet, Dickson Kaelo, Simangele Msweli, Khalid Mather, Jean Harris, Maxi Louis, Rachel Kramer, Taye Teferi, Melita Samoilys, Linzi Lewis, Andrew Bennie, Frederick Kumah, Moenieba Isaacs, Pauline Nantongo |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 138 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 19 | 14% |
Kenya | 13 | 9% |
United States | 11 | 8% |
South Africa | 7 | 5% |
Germany | 5 | 4% |
Canada | 3 | 2% |
Croatia | 2 | 1% |
Brazil | 2 | 1% |
Sweden | 2 | 1% |
Other | 20 | 14% |
Unknown | 54 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 104 | 75% |
Scientists | 28 | 20% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 3% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 121 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 28 | 23% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 16% |
Student > Master | 11 | 9% |
Other | 10 | 8% |
Professor | 6 | 5% |
Other | 18 | 15% |
Unknown | 29 | 24% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Environmental Science | 30 | 25% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 26 | 21% |
Social Sciences | 11 | 9% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 3% |
Arts and Humanities | 4 | 3% |
Other | 9 | 7% |
Unknown | 37 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 194. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 June 2023.
All research outputs
#209,784
of 25,848,323 outputs
Outputs from Science
#5,969
of 83,353 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,838
of 439,115 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#108
of 708 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,848,323 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 83,353 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 66.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,115 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 708 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.