| Title |
Active learning: “Hands-on” meets “minds-on”
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Science, September 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1126/science.abj9957 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nesra Yannier, Scott E Hudson, Kenneth R Koedinger, Kathy Hirsh-Pasek, Roberta Michnick Golinkoff, Yuko Munakata, Sabine Doebel, Daniel L Schwartz, Louis Deslauriers, Logan McCarty, Kristina Callaghan, Elli J Theobald, Scott Freeman, Katelyn M Cooper, Sara E Brownell |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 162 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 56 | 35% |
| Canada | 8 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 2% |
| Brazil | 4 | 2% |
| Germany | 3 | 2% |
| Australia | 3 | 2% |
| Chile | 3 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 1% |
| Philippines | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 15 | 9% |
| Unknown | 62 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 107 | 66% |
| Scientists | 49 | 30% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 2% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 82 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 10 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 6% |
| Professor | 5 | 6% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 12 | 15% |
| Unknown | 41 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 6 | 7% |
| Chemistry | 4 | 5% |
| Psychology | 4 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 4% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 21 | 26% |
| Unknown | 41 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 577. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2023.
All research outputs
#41,018
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from Science
#1,680
of 83,125 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,293
of 436,560 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#43
of 545 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 83,125 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 65.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,560 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 545 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.