The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,436 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||988||69%|
|Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals)||134||9%|
|Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors)||41||3%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 238 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||34||14%|
|Student > Master||17||7%|
|Professor > Associate Professor||12||5%|
|Student > Bachelor||11||5%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Medicine and Dentistry||14||6%|
|Physics and Astronomy||8||3%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3138. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2023.
All research outputs
of 24,508,104 outputs
Outputs from Science
of 79,830 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 421,972 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
of 462 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,508,104 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 79,830 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 64.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,972 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 462 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.