The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 66 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Erosion of heterogeneous rock drives diversification of Appalachian fishes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Science, May 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1126/science.add9791 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Maya F Stokes, Daemin Kim, Sean F Gallen, Edgar Benavides, Benjamin P Keck, Julia Wood, Samuel L Goldberg, Isaac J Larsen, Jon Michael Mollish, Jeffrey W Simmons, Thomas J Near, J Taylor Perron |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 19 | 29% |
| Canada | 3 | 5% |
| Argentina | 2 | 3% |
| Spain | 2 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 3% |
| Greece | 2 | 3% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 2% |
| Lithuania | 1 | 2% |
| India | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Unknown | 29 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 39 | 59% |
| Scientists | 25 | 38% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 31 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 23% |
| Researcher | 6 | 19% |
| Professor | 4 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Unknown | 6 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 11 | 35% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 29% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 3% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 7 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 178. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2024.
All research outputs
#244,848
of 26,729,497 outputs
Outputs from Science
#6,695
of 84,412 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,615
of 402,921 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#131
of 417 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,729,497 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 84,412 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 66.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 402,921 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 417 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.