| Title |
Cryptic diversity of cellulose-degrading gut bacteria in industrialized humans
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Science, March 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1126/science.adj9223 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sarah Moraïs, Sarah Winkler, Alvah Zorea, Liron Levin, Falk S P Nagies, Nils Kapust, Eva Lamed, Avital Artan-Furman, David N Bolam, Madhav P Yadav, Edward A Bayer, William F Martin, Itzhak Mizrahi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 436 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 40 | 9% |
| Japan | 36 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 18 | 4% |
| Israel | 14 | 3% |
| Germany | 9 | 2% |
| Australia | 8 | 2% |
| France | 7 | 2% |
| Spain | 6 | 1% |
| India | 6 | 1% |
| Other | 58 | 13% |
| Unknown | 234 | 54% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 301 | 69% |
| Scientists | 119 | 27% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 12 | 3% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 40 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 9 | 23% |
| Unspecified | 7 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 18% |
| Other | 5 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 4 | 10% |
| Unknown | 5 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 20% |
| Unspecified | 7 | 18% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 18% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 8% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 13% |
| Unknown | 8 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 749. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2024.
All research outputs
#26,952
of 25,784,004 outputs
Outputs from Science
#1,208
of 83,333 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#410
of 304,253 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#14
of 389 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,784,004 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 83,333 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 66.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 304,253 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 389 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.