↓ Skip to main content

Science

Reading Literary Fiction Improves Theory of Mind

Overview of attention for article published in Science, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
1054 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1802 Mendeley
citeulike
11 CiteULike
Title
Reading Literary Fiction Improves Theory of Mind
Published in
Science, October 2013
DOI 10.1126/science.1239918
Pubmed ID
Authors

David Comer Kidd, Emanuele Castano

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 924 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,802 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 22 1%
United Kingdom 12 <1%
Spain 5 <1%
Netherlands 4 <1%
Japan 4 <1%
Germany 4 <1%
Taiwan 4 <1%
Australia 3 <1%
Canada 3 <1%
Other 21 1%
Unknown 1720 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 288 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 246 14%
Researcher 194 11%
Student > Master 173 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 92 5%
Other 328 18%
Unknown 481 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 444 25%
Social Sciences 140 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 105 6%
Arts and Humanities 103 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 94 5%
Other 399 22%
Unknown 517 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2235. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 July 2024.
All research outputs
#3,964
of 26,374,559 outputs
Outputs from Science
#202
of 83,925 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14
of 222,109 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#4
of 836 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,374,559 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 83,925 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 66.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 222,109 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 836 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.