↓ Skip to main content

Science

A mid-term analysis of progress toward international biodiversity targets

Overview of attention for article published in Science, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
20 news outlets
blogs
6 blogs
policy
8 policy sources
twitter
88 X users
facebook
5 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
968 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1449 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
A mid-term analysis of progress toward international biodiversity targets
Published in
Science, October 2014
DOI 10.1126/science.1257484
Pubmed ID
Authors

Derek P Tittensor, Matt Walpole, Samantha L L Hill, Daniel G Boyce, Gregory L Britten, Neil D Burgess, Stuart H M Butchart, Paul W Leadley, Eugenie C Regan, Rob Alkemade, Roswitha Baumung, Céline Bellard, Lex Bouwman, Nadine J Bowles-Newark, Anna M Chenery, William W L Cheung, Villy Christensen, H David Cooper, Annabel R Crowther, Matthew J R Dixon, Alessandro Galli, Valérie Gaveau, Richard D Gregory, Nicolas L Gutierrez, Tim L Hirsch, Robert Höft, Stephanie R Januchowski-Hartley, Marion Karmann, Cornelia B Krug, Fiona J Leverington, Jonathan Loh, Rik Kutsch Lojenga, Kelly Malsch, Alexandra Marques, David H W Morgan, Peter J Mumby, Tim Newbold, Kieran Noonan-Mooney, Shyama N Pagad, Bradley C Parks, Henrique M Pereira, Tim Robertson, Carlo Rondinini, Luca Santini, Jörn P W Scharlemann, Stefan Schindler, U Rashid Sumaila, Louise S L Teh, Jennifer van Kolck, Piero Visconti, Yimin Ye

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 88 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,449 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 15 1%
United States 8 <1%
Italy 8 <1%
Denmark 4 <1%
Germany 4 <1%
Brazil 4 <1%
France 4 <1%
Switzerland 3 <1%
Spain 3 <1%
Other 27 2%
Unknown 1369 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 303 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 271 19%
Student > Master 200 14%
Student > Bachelor 134 9%
Other 73 5%
Other 217 15%
Unknown 251 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 480 33%
Environmental Science 416 29%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 53 4%
Social Sciences 39 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 23 2%
Other 108 7%
Unknown 330 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 259. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2024.
All research outputs
#144,008
of 25,791,949 outputs
Outputs from Science
#4,437
of 83,344 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,225
of 266,516 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#47
of 875 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,791,949 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 83,344 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 66.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,516 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 875 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.