↓ Skip to main content

Science

Article Metrics

Marine defaunation: Animal loss in the global ocean

Overview of attention for article published in Science, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
356 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1219 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Marine defaunation: Animal loss in the global ocean
Published in
Science, January 2015
DOI 10.1126/science.1255641
Pubmed ID
Authors

D. J. McCauley, M. L. Pinsky, S. R. Palumbi, J. A. Estes, F. H. Joyce, R. R. Warner

Abstract

Marine defaunation, or human-caused animal loss in the oceans, emerged forcefully only hundreds of years ago, whereas terrestrial defaunation has been occurring far longer. Though humans have caused few global marine extinctions, we have profoundly affected marine wildlife, altering the functioning and provisioning of services in every ocean. Current ocean trends, coupled with terrestrial defaunation lessons, suggest that marine defaunation rates will rapidly intensify as human use of the oceans industrializes. Though protected areas are a powerful tool to harness ocean productivity, especially when designed with future climate in mind, additional management strategies will be required. Overall, habitat degradation is likely to intensify as a major driver of marine wildlife loss. Proactive intervention can avert a marine defaunation disaster of the magnitude observed on land.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 643 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,219 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 32 3%
Brazil 10 <1%
Spain 8 <1%
Germany 8 <1%
United Kingdom 6 <1%
France 5 <1%
Sweden 3 <1%
Australia 3 <1%
Denmark 3 <1%
Other 28 2%
Unknown 1113 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 266 22%
Researcher 253 21%
Student > Master 215 18%
Student > Bachelor 166 14%
Unspecified 70 6%
Other 249 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 567 47%
Environmental Science 357 29%
Unspecified 115 9%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 73 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 26 2%
Other 81 7%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1045. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2019.
All research outputs
#3,363
of 13,231,712 outputs
Outputs from Science
#264
of 61,471 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79
of 333,390 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#8
of 1,048 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,231,712 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 61,471 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 43.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,390 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,048 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.