↓ Skip to main content

Science

Article Metrics

Marine defaunation: Animal loss in the global ocean

Overview of attention for article published in Science, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
287 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1118 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Marine defaunation: Animal loss in the global ocean
Published in
Science, January 2015
DOI 10.1126/science.1255641
Pubmed ID
Authors

D. J. McCauley, M. L. Pinsky, S. R. Palumbi, J. A. Estes, F. H. Joyce, R. R. Warner

Abstract

Marine defaunation, or human-caused animal loss in the oceans, emerged forcefully only hundreds of years ago, whereas terrestrial defaunation has been occurring far longer. Though humans have caused few global marine extinctions, we have profoundly affected marine wildlife, altering the functioning and provisioning of services in every ocean. Current ocean trends, coupled with terrestrial defaunation lessons, suggest that marine defaunation rates will rapidly intensify as human use of the oceans industrializes. Though protected areas are a powerful tool to harness ocean productivity, especially when designed with future climate in mind, additional management strategies will be required. Overall, habitat degradation is likely to intensify as a major driver of marine wildlife loss. Proactive intervention can avert a marine defaunation disaster of the magnitude observed on land.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 640 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,118 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 32 3%
Brazil 10 <1%
Spain 8 <1%
Germany 7 <1%
United Kingdom 6 <1%
France 5 <1%
Denmark 3 <1%
Sweden 3 <1%
Australia 3 <1%
Other 29 3%
Unknown 1012 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 249 22%
Researcher 229 20%
Student > Master 206 18%
Student > Bachelor 153 14%
Unspecified 55 5%
Other 226 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 537 48%
Environmental Science 327 29%
Unspecified 89 8%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 70 6%
Social Sciences 24 2%
Other 71 6%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1046. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 January 2019.
All research outputs
#2,874
of 12,374,984 outputs
Outputs from Science
#207
of 58,278 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72
of 306,188 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#8
of 1,034 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,374,984 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 58,278 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 306,188 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,034 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.