↓ Skip to main content

Science

Dunes on Pluto

Overview of attention for article published in Science, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
160 news outlets
blogs
15 blogs
twitter
334 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
facebook
6 Facebook pages
wikipedia
18 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users
video
2 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
94 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
95 Mendeley
Title
Dunes on Pluto
Published in
Science, June 2018
DOI 10.1126/science.aao2975
Pubmed ID
Authors

Matt W. Telfer, Eric J. R. Parteli, Jani Radebaugh, Ross A. Beyer, Tanguy Bertrand, François Forget, Francis Nimmo, Will M. Grundy, Jeffrey M. Moore, S. Alan Stern, John Spencer, Tod R. Lauer, Alissa M. Earle, Richard P. Binzel, Hal A. Weaver, Cathy B. Olkin, Leslie A. Young, Kimberly Ennico, Kirby Runyon, Marc Buie, Bonnie Buratti, Andy Cheng, J.J. Kavelaars, Ivan Linscott, William B. McKinnon, Harold Reitsema, Dennis Reuter, Paul Schenk, Mark Showalter, Len Tyler

Abstract

The surface of Pluto is more geologically diverse and dynamic than had been expected, but the role of its tenuous atmosphere in shaping the landscape remains unclear. We describe observations from the New Horizons spacecraft of regularly spaced, linear ridges whose morphology, distribution, and orientation are consistent with being transverse dunes. These are located close to mountainous regions and are orthogonal to nearby wind streaks. We demonstrate that the wavelength of the dunes (~0.4 to 1 kilometer) is best explained by the deposition of sand-sized (~200 to ~300 micrometer) particles of methane ice in moderate winds (<10 meters per second). The undisturbed morphology of the dunes, and relationships with the underlying convective glacial ice, imply that the dunes have formed in the very recent geological past.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 334 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 95 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 26%
Researcher 13 14%
Student > Master 11 12%
Student > Bachelor 7 7%
Professor 6 6%
Other 18 19%
Unknown 15 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 46 48%
Physics and Astronomy 11 12%
Engineering 5 5%
Chemistry 3 3%
Environmental Science 2 2%
Other 11 12%
Unknown 17 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1590. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2024.
All research outputs
#7,183
of 25,795,662 outputs
Outputs from Science
#390
of 83,296 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#110
of 344,088 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#13
of 1,192 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,795,662 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 83,296 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 66.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,088 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,192 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.