| Title |
Information arms race explains plant-herbivore chemical communication in ecological communities
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Science, June 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1126/science.aba2965 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Pengjuan Zu, Karina Boege, Ek del-Val, Meredith C. Schuman, Philip C. Stevenson, Alejandro Zaldivar-Riverón, Serguei Saavedra |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 139 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 22 | 16% |
| United Kingdom | 17 | 12% |
| India | 6 | 4% |
| Switzerland | 4 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 4 | 3% |
| Germany | 3 | 2% |
| Mexico | 3 | 2% |
| Portugal | 2 | 1% |
| Sweden | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 17 | 12% |
| Unknown | 59 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 68 | 49% |
| Scientists | 67 | 48% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 109 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 21 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 8% |
| Other | 15 | 14% |
| Unknown | 17 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 42 | 39% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 13 | 12% |
| Environmental Science | 11 | 10% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Chemistry | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 11 | 10% |
| Unknown | 26 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 319. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 July 2021.
All research outputs
#100,085
of 24,508,104 outputs
Outputs from Science
#3,288
of 79,830 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,498
of 403,648 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#133
of 974 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,508,104 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 79,830 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 64.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 403,648 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 974 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.