The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 390 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
The evolution of a tropical biodiversity hotspot
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Science, December 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1126/science.aaz6970 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michael G Harvey, Gustavo A Bravo, Santiago Claramunt, Andrés M Cuervo, Graham E Derryberry, Jaqueline Battilana, Glenn F Seeholzer, Jessica Shearer McKay, Brian C O'Meara, Brant C Faircloth, Scott V Edwards, Jorge Pérez-Emán, Robert G Moyle, Frederick H Sheldon, Alexandre Aleixo, Brian Tilston Smith, R Terry Chesser, Luís Fábio Silveira, Joel Cracraft, Robb T Brumfield, Elizabeth P Derryberry |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 47 | 12% |
| Colombia | 9 | 2% |
| India | 7 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 2% |
| Canada | 5 | 1% |
| Japan | 4 | 1% |
| Brazil | 3 | <1% |
| Germany | 3 | <1% |
| China | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 23 | 6% |
| Unknown | 281 | 72% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 226 | 58% |
| Scientists | 153 | 39% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 8 | 2% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 432 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 432 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 72 | 17% |
| Researcher | 66 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 57 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 44 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 24 | 6% |
| Other | 57 | 13% |
| Unknown | 112 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 189 | 44% |
| Environmental Science | 43 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 34 | 8% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 13 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 1% |
| Other | 21 | 5% |
| Unknown | 127 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 410. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2024.
All research outputs
#75,987
of 26,388,722 outputs
Outputs from Science
#2,663
of 83,918 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,236
of 535,431 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#68
of 895 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,388,722 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 83,918 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 66.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 535,431 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 895 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.