The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 68 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||38||56%|
|Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals)||1||1%|
|Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors)||1||1%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||36||30%|
|Student > Master||7||6%|
|Student > Doctoral Student||6||5%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Earth and Planetary Sciences||39||32%|
|Physics and Astronomy||32||26%|
|Agricultural and Biological Sciences||2||2%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 313. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2022.
All research outputs
of 24,692,658 outputs
Outputs from Science
of 80,026 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 515,955 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
of 858 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,692,658 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 80,026 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 64.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 515,955 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 858 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.